The Seven Organizational Approaches free essay sample

The seven organizational approaches to studying the human body are body planes and body directions, body cavities, quadrants and regions, anatomy and physiology, microscopic to macroscopic, body systems and medical specializes. The body planes and body direction is the division of the body in to sections from front to back, right and left, and top and bottom. These sections are called the mitigated plane, the coronal plane, and the transverse plane.This approach is used when studying organs and its function or specific areas with in the body like lungs, brain, and Joint and tendons. The body cavity is the study of the body cavities and the organs in the cavities. This approach is used when studying certain organs in the body and how a disease affects different organs. The quadrants and regions divides the lower torso into four sections and nine region sections to identify the areas where internal organs are placed. We will write a custom essay sample on The Seven Organizational Approaches or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This approach is a good reference to be used when conducting a hysterical exam of internal organs.The anatomy and physiology is the study of the structures with in the body and how they function in the body. This approach is good to be used when studying the structure and how cell work or the nervous system. Microscopic and macroscopic is the study of the smallest parts of the body and how they come together to make larger parts and more complex structures or systems. This approach is good to use when studying how cells combine to make organ. The Body systems approach is the study of the body organs and how they function gather in the body. This approach is good to be used when studying the bodies systems such as the circulatory system, the respiratory system and how they function in the body. Medical specialty is the study of the human body for medical uses. This approach is also divided in to many different categories which are the use or study of anatomy, physiology diseases, diagnostic tests, medical and surgical procedures, and drugs. This approach is used when studying different types of illnesses and diseases.

Bernard Arnaults Leadership

Bernard Arnaults Leadership Introduction Many are the times that people pose to evaluate others whom they consider as leaders. A major mistake that they (people) all make is to associate leadership with public visibility and greatness. This perception inhibits one’s capacity to develop and nurture leadership skills (Ogbonna Harris 2000).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Bernard Arnault’s Leadership specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More If only people could change their perception about leadership, they could be able to identify their leadership talents and therefore work towards improving them. Daft posits, â€Å"Leadership comes in all shapes and sizes, and many true leaders are working behind the scenes. Leadership that has big outcomes often starts small† (2011, p. 6). This paper will focus on the leadership of Bernard Arnault. Arnault as a Leader Bernard Arnault is considered a leader because of his success in LVMH Company. The company deals with fashion products, which makes it one of the toughest businesses to operate. Despite the numerous changes that keep on arising in the fashion industry, Bernard is able to keep pace with the changes (Givhan 2002). Fashion business requires a leader who is able to identify what to modify or drop to enhance its performance. Arnault is one such leader who accentuates success in LVMH. Under Arnault’s enormous merchandise dexterities, LVMH has managed to rise into one of the biggest companies in the manufacture and sale of cosmetics, jewellery, and perfumes. Through his leadership, brands like Fendi, Vuitton, and Christian Dior gained popularity thus becoming the most preferred perfumes. By comparing Arnault’s background and his success in LVMH, one would not doubt that he is one the leaders that are rare to find. After graduating with an engineering degree, he assisted his father in a construction company (Givhan 2002). He always wished to trade in lux ury products, a dream that led to him purchasing Boussac. Later, he sold Boussac and purchased part of LVMH. In spite of having limited knowledge in fashion industry, Arnault had leadership traits, which helped him gain control of the company gradually. His ability to manage a business and creativity are some of the factors that make him a great leader. Strengths and weaknesses Situational theories of leadership suppose, â€Å"Leaders choose the best course of action based upon situational variables† (Vecchio 1987, p. 445). Prior to making any decision, leaders evaluate the situation to determine the appropriate course to take. The same happens with Arnault. One of the Arnault’s strengths is his ability to evaluate business environment and change his operation style to cope with the prevailing situation.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More For instance, A rnault started with purchasing majority of the luxury brands, which helped him grow his financial base, as well as, expand his business. However, economic changes in the early 21st century led to many people ceasing to use many luxury goods. To make sure that LVMH continues to do well in the market, Barnard embarked on a quality improvement strategy. His ability to maintain the brand quality is what has helped the company remain competitive across the globe. One of Arnault’s weaknesses is his ambition to establish a business conglomerate that encompasses all luxury products. On one side, the ambition might be of significant benefit since it helps to reinforce the financial base of the business. The problem arises when it comes to managing all the brands. Despite Arnault having leadership skills, he is unable to manage many brands leading to some of his brands encountering financial challenges (McKee, Kemp Spence 2013). In the early 2000, Barnard was forced to scale back some of his brands because he could not sustain them. Arnault’s inability to manage many brands is what made him focus on a few brands. Arnault as an Effective Leader An effective leader is one that is able to identify opportunities and capitalize on them (Druskat Wheeler 2003). Arnault is a visionary leader who has helped LVMH to achieve its current growth. Since Barnard assumed leadership of LVMH, the company has relentlessly worked on improving the quality of its products. One of Arnault’s leadership styles entails identifying brands that are preferred in the market and working on enhancing the quality of these brands. Upon analysing how Arnault makes decisions to purchase a particular brand, one learns that he focuses on renowned brands. The recent intention to purchase Hermes depicts Arnault’s ambition to dominate the fashion industry. Currently, LVMH’s brands are very competitive in the market. Under Arnault’s leadership, LVMH continues introduc ing novel fashions and styles in the fashion industry (Druskat Wheeler 2003). Currently, Arnault’s leadership is witnessed in at least 60 brands across the globe. Fashion brands such as Christian Dior, Donna Karan, and Fendi are major testimonies of Arnault’s personal leadership. His emphasis on quality made these products popular in the market. In spite of Christian Dior being in the market for a long time, the brand is still popular. Many customers prefer it to other rival brands. Arnault’s leadership has helped LVMH attain its current glory in the fashion industry.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Bernard Arnault’s Leadership specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Despite Arnault helping LVMH dominate the fashion industry, he has a number of shortcomings in his management style. He is an aggressive leader who settles for nothing short of the best. This trait underlines the reason why he purc hased numerous brands during his early years in LVMH. One of the major limitations of Arnault’s leadership style is that it generates unhealthy competition in the industry making it hard for majority of the infant industries to grow. He uses this style to incapacitate the young companies, therefore, getting a chance to purchase them. In the process, he ensures that he cuts down competition levels in the market. A good management style is the one that is open and transparent. Nevertheless, Arnault’s management style shows a level of dishonesty (Wetlaufer 2001). After learning that Hermes was doing well in the market, he sought to collaborate with the company in the production of some of the fashion products. What the management in Hermes’ Company did not know is that Arnault aimed at purchasing Hermes’ stock gradually, therefore, gaining control of the company (Thomas 2011). Eventually, he would assume leadership of the company thus managing all its operat ions. In a way, Arnault harboured an ulterior motive when he decided to invest in Hermes. He did not care about the company’s leadership as well as clients. All he wanted was to gain control of the company and or divert all its income to himself. Conclusion Bernard Arnault is a visionary leader who has helped LVMH to attain its current success in the fashion industry. Desire to dominate the fashion industry led to Arnault buying numerous fashion companies immediately after he became the leader of LVMH. Under his leadership, the company has improved the quality of majority of its brands making them outstanding in the market. Nevertheless, his leadership has had several limitations. For instance, in his effort to expand his conglomerate, Arnault ends up harming the young companies thus making it hard for them to grow. In other words, his management style discourages competition, which is of great value to customers. References Daft, R 2011, The Leadership Experience, United Sta tes, Thomson.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Druskat, V Wheeler, J 2003, ‘Managing from the boundary: the effective leadership of self-managing work teams’, The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 46 no. 4, pp. 435-457. Givhan, R 2002, ‘The French Connection: Bernard Arnault Built a Fashion Empire, but Dont Expect Any Air Kisses’, Washington Post, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 13-19. McKee, A, Kemp, T, Spence, G 2013, Management: A Focus on Leaders, Pearson Education, Australia. Ogbonna, E Harris, C 2000, ‘Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: empirical evidence from UK companies’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 11 no. 4, pp. 766-788. Thomas, D, 2011, The Battle for Hermes, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903596904576517151602728260 Vecchio, R 1987, ‘Situational Leadership Theory: An examination of a perspective theory’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 72 no. 3, pp. 444-451. Wetlaufer, S 2001, ‘The Perfect Parado x of Star Brands: An Interview with Bernard Arnault of LVMH’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 1 no. 1, p. 116.

American History Research Paper (Tobacco) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

American History (Tobacco) - Research Paper Example obacco growing would be embraced by so many people in Virginia that it became one of the most important cash crop and export from Virginia, and eventually becoming a dominant force in the economical and social structure in the region (Davies, 2015). Robert Adams, Captain of the Elizabeth transported Rolfe’s tobacco samples to England on 20th of July 1613.Even though Rolfe’s initial tobacco was regarded by the British to be of â€Å"excellent quality† all the same, it was not as good as the Spanish one. However, Rolfe was of the opinion that its quality would improve after some more expense and try all in the curing, it would definitely be comparable to the best product West Indies could offer. Rolfe was proved right when 20,000 pounds of tobacco from Virginia were shipped in 1617 to England with that quantity doubling in 1618 (Wertenbaker, 2009). It is these tobacco experiments performed successfully by Rolfe that inspired others to start planting tobacco in the vacant land in Jamestown as well as settlements alongside River James. General planting initially started at West as well as Shirley hundreds; moving eastwards to Point Comfort alongside a one hundred and forty mile stretch of River James. In spite of the 1622 Indian uprising that led to the killing of around 350 colonists together with the destruction of numerous plantations, the crop of the settlers produced sixty thousand pounds. The British afterwards in the 1620s took control over of cleared Indian plantations and spread tobacco growing even more by making use of the headright system, whereby farmers paid to ferry people across the Atlantic for 50 acres of land. By 1629, cultivation of the Accomac peninsula started in earnest when a sum of two thousand acres of tobacco was cultivated there (Wertenbaker, 2009). At around the same period, the uneconomical practice of cultivating 3 to 4 tobacco crops within the same field started to exhaust the soil nutrients around and within Jamestown. In 1632, a